If you run a residential real estate brokerage, you're sitting on a goldmine you've probably stopped looking at. Your CRM is full of people who once raised a hand, asked about a home valuation, or inquired about a listing, then went quiet. According to the National Association of REALTORS' 2025 generational trends report, two-thirds of sellers hire an agent they already know or were referred to by someone they know. Only about 4% hire an agent who contacted them directly. That puts your old leads in a strange middle ground: they aren't strangers, but they aren't clients yet. They already know your name and they contacted you first. Working that list properly is repetitive, awkward, and easy to put off. That's why a whole category of providers has emerged to do it for you, using AI calling, multi-channel outreach, and CRM-connected workflows. This guide compares seven options for 2026, from full-service growth partners to email-first platforms. We ranked them on how well they handle the specific mess of real estate databases: stale records, consent rules, and the need to book appointments with context attached.
#1 Worqd — Contact for pricing. No public rates. Work is scoped on a free growth call against the results that matter to you. The booking funnel captures monthly marketing budget bands from 'Not spending yet' to '$25,000+'.
Worqd is an AI-powered growth agency, not a software platform. That distinction matters for brokerages because reactivation is a process problem more than a tooling problem. Worqd runs old lead reactivation as a retainer service: it works with your existing CRM (no platform switch), groups dormant contacts by what they originally asked for and how long ago they went quiet, and then uses AI SDRs and AI voice agents to reach out, qualify, and book the moment a reply arrives. The company claims every inquiry is qualified in under 60 seconds, 24/7, including after-hours and weekends. That speed is the whole point with old leads. Someone who replies to a reactivation text at 9pm on a Sunday is not going to wait until Monday morning for a callback. What separates Worqd from the email-blast tools on this list is that it owns the full path from first contact to booked call. It doesn't just send messages and hand you a list of opens. The AI SDRs hold the conversation by text and phone, follow the answer instead of reading a script, and put the few who are ready onto your calendar with the context attached. Worqd says its AI SDRs deliver a 4–7x conversion lift over unmanaged follow-up at 70–80% lower cost per qualified conversation versus a traditional SDR team. Those are the company's claims, not independently verified numbers, so treat them as directional. The pricing model is aligned with the outcome: you only pay for the conversations that come back. Scoping happens on a free growth call. Worqd also brings capabilities most reactivation vendors don't have. It can pair reactivation with new lead generation, demand generation, AI creative, and AI search visibility, so old and new demand run through one partner and one report. The company is based in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and serves clients remotely. Its anti-fabrication policy is worth noting: it says it uses clearly marked placeholders until real evidence is approved, and it doesn't invent revenue lifts, logos, or named clients. For a brokerage that needs to explain vendor claims to a compliance-minded principal broker, that's a useful posture.
Pros
- Full-service execution: outreach, qualification, and booking handled end to end
- Sub-60-second response on every reply, including nights and weekends
- No platform migration; works with your existing CRM
- Can combine reactivation with new lead generation and creative under one partner
- Outcome-aligned pricing on recovered conversations
Cons
- Retainer agency model, not self-serve software, so you don't control the day-to-day
- No public pricing, which makes budgeting harder before the first call
- Conversion lift claims (4–7x) are the company's own and not independently verified
- Less suitable if you want to run reactivation entirely in-house
Best for: Residential brokerages that want a done-for-you reactivation partner and are willing to run it as a retainer service rather than buy another dashboard. Best fit for teams with a CRM full of old leads and no internal capacity to work them consistently.
#2 Happy Grasshopper — Contact for pricing. The site offers a free test drive; specific plan rates were not listed on the pages reviewed.
Happy Grasshopper is a real estate-specific content and reactivation service. According to its website, it creates plug-and-play database reactivation campaigns tailored to real estate professionals, complete with the messages, timing, and automation. The company's approach is built around short, intentional, personal messages rather than generic 'just checking in' emails. Its guidance recommends segmenting dormant contacts into groups like past buyers, past sellers, unconverted prospects, and long-term nurture leads, then tailoring outreach to each group. Happy Grasshopper's strength is the writing and the cadence. Its site lays out a multi-channel reactivation model that includes email for in-depth updates, text messages for quick check-ins, ringless voicemail for a personal voice touch, and social DMs where an existing connection exists. It also recommends running campaigns quarterly or twice a year, and triggering outreach after market changes like rate drops or new inventory spikes. For a brokerage that wants a structured, content-led reactivation program without building the copy from scratch, this is a reasonable fit. The limitation is scope. Happy Grasshopper is primarily a messaging and campaign service. It doesn't appear to offer AI voice agents that hold live conversations or book appointments with context attached. If your old leads need a phone conversation to move, you'll still need someone on your team to make the calls. Pricing isn't published on the pages reviewed; the site offers a free test drive and a sign-in for existing customers.
Pros
- Real estate-specific messaging and campaign structure
- Multi-channel approach beyond email alone
- Low lift to launch: campaigns come pre-written and timed
- Free test drive lowers the risk of trying it
Cons
- Primarily a messaging service; no AI voice agents for live qualification and booking
- Requires your team to handle phone follow-up and appointment setting
- Pricing not published, so cost comparison takes a sales conversation
Best for: Real estate agents and brokerages that want professionally written reactivation campaigns and a structured multi-channel cadence, with their own team handling live phone conversations.
#3 RealtyLT — Contact for pricing. Rates were not listed on the pages reviewed.
RealtyLT publishes a detailed, compliance-forward approach to AI database reactivation for real estate. According to its blog, its reactivation campaign makes four moves: it goes through the whole list rather than the top of it, opens with something true about the contact (referencing what they actually asked about), holds the conversation by text and phone at whatever hour the reply arrives, and books the few who are ready with the context attached. The company describes grouping dormant contacts by what they originally asked for and how long ago they went quiet, so the first message can be specific instead of generic. What stands out about RealtyLT is that it addresses the hard part most vendors skip: consent. Its site walks through federal do-not-call rules, including the established business relationship exemption under 47 CFR 64.1200(f)(5), which it says runs from a purchase or transaction within the 18 months preceding the call, or on the basis of an inquiry or application. It also notes that an automated call or text to a mobile number needs written consent. The company frames this as a list of questions you're entitled to ask any vendor before they send a message with your name on it, and it includes itself in that standard. The company's positioning is honest about outcomes: most of the list will still say no, and that's the expected result rather than a failure. The handful whose circumstances moved get booked with what they just said attached, so the agent walks in already knowing there's a house to sell. Pricing isn't published on the pages reviewed. If compliance risk is your main concern with reactivation, this is the provider on the list that talks about it most directly.
Pros
- Unusually clear public guidance on consent and do-not-call rules
- Context-rich appointment booking, not just name and time
- Realistic about conversion expectations
- Real estate-specific focus
Cons
- Pricing not published
- Newer and less established than some competitors on this list
- Limited public information on integrations beyond CRM connection
Best for: Brokerages that want AI reactivation and are particularly focused on consent and do-not-call compliance. Good fit for teams that need to justify outreach practices to a principal broker or legal counsel.
#4 Olivia (by Pete & Gabi) — Contact for pricing. Rates were not listed on the page reviewed.
Olivia is an AI sales agent built specifically for customer reactivation and revenue recovery, according to Pete & Gabi's website. It handles high-volume outbound calling, qualifies intent in real time, updates CRMs, and escalates hot conversations directly to sales teams. The company says Olivia holds natural, human-like conversations that adapt to objections, assess customer sentiment, and offer personalized win-back incentives in real time. It's positioned as plug-and-play with existing CRMs, and the company claims it starts generating revenue within days. The platform's strengths are voice-first execution and compliance readiness. According to the company, it captures consent and is highly compliance-ready, which matters for real estate given the do-not-call rules around automated calls and texts. It also updates your CRM with call outcomes and notes, so the record stays current. Deployment is described as fast, with clear ROI tied to recovered deals. The trade-off is that Olivia is voice-first. The company itself lists limited visual chat capability as a con. For old real estate leads who prefer to reply by text, that's a real limitation. It also isn't real estate-specific, so the messaging and objection handling are general-purpose rather than tuned to home valuations, listing timelines, or agent selection. Best results require clean escalation rules, per the company. Pricing isn't published on the page reviewed.
Pros
- Purpose-built for reactivation and revenue recovery
- Handles high call volume without quality degradation, per the company
- Fast deployment with CRM integration
- Compliance-ready consent capture
Cons
- Voice-first with limited visual chat capability
- Not real estate-specific
- Best results require clean escalation rules
- Pricing not published
Best for: Revenue teams that want voice-first AI reactivation at high volume and have a sales team ready to take escalated conversations. Works for brokerages comfortable with a general-purpose AI caller rather than a real estate-specific one.
#5 Launch Leads — Contact for pricing. Rates were not listed on the page reviewed.
Launch Leads publishes a detailed dead lead revival framework aimed primarily at B2B companies, but the playbook transfers well to residential real estate. According to its site, dead lead revival is the systematic process of re-engaging prospects who previously showed interest but stopped responding. The company notes that previous engagement means demonstrated interest, and that most closed-lost opportunities cite timing or budget as the reason, not fit. Six months later, budgets reset and priorities shift, which is exactly the dynamic in real estate when a buyer or seller said 'not right now.' The site is specific about the challenges that sink revival campaigns: CRM data has decayed, original context is missing, leads feel embarrassed or awkward, no systematic process exists, and sales reps resist working old leads. It offers practical responses to each, including verifying contact data before outreach, reconstructing the story from CRM notes and email threads, and giving leads an easy out with language like 'No need to explain what happened, things come up.' Launch Leads is a lead generation company with a revival strategy framework rather than a reactivation software platform. That means the value here is the playbook, not a tool that executes it for you. If your brokerage has an inside sales team or ISA team that can run the process, the framework is useful. If you need execution handled, look elsewhere on this list. Pricing isn't published on the page reviewed.
Pros
- Detailed, practical framework with specific language
- Addresses the human awkwardness that kills revival campaigns
- Transferable to real estate from its B2B roots
- Free to read and apply
Cons
- Framework and strategy, not an execution platform
- B2B-oriented, so real estate specifics need adaptation
- Requires internal team capacity to run the process
- Pricing for any done-for-you services not published
Best for: Brokerages with an internal ISA or inside sales team that wants a proven revival playbook to run themselves. Less suitable if you need the execution done for you.
#6 Klaviyo — From about $20 to $1,200 per month depending on email volume, according to Inflo Partners' 2026 comparison.
Klaviyo is an email and marketing automation platform that shows up on reactivation shortlists because of its segmentation and automation depth. According to Inflo Partners' comparison, Klaviyo is best for businesses sending high email volumes, with powerful segmentation and automation, pre-built templates, and a dense interface that requires a learning curve. Pricing runs from about $20 to $1,200 per month depending on volume. For residential real estate, Klaviyo works best as the email engine for a reactivation sequence rather than a complete reactivation solution. You can build segments of dormant contacts, run multi-step sequences with different hooks, and track opens and clicks. The platform is general-purpose, so you'll write the real estate-specific copy yourself or bring in a copywriter. It doesn't make phone calls, qualify intent in a live conversation, or book appointments with context attached. The honest limitation is fit. Inflo's review notes that Klaviyo is overkill for senders doing 100K emails per month or fewer, and that you'd be paying for features you won't use. Most brokerages don't send at that volume. If your old lead list is a few thousand contacts and you want email-only reactivation, a simpler platform may be cheaper. Klaviyo is on this list because it genuinely handles the segmentation and sequencing well, not because it's built for real estate.
Pros
- Deep segmentation and automation
- Handles high email volumes reliably
- Transparent tiered pricing
- Large template and integration ecosystem
Cons
- General-purpose, not real estate-specific
- No phone calls or live qualification
- Dense interface with a learning curve
- Overkill and expensive for low-volume senders
Best for: Brokerages with large contact lists and an internal marketing person who wants full control over email segmentation and sequencing. Less suitable for teams that need phone outreach or appointment booking included.
#7 Close — From about $99 to $300+ per month, according to Inflo Partners' 2026 comparison.
Close is a CRM with email built in, and it lands on reactivation lists for a different reason than the email platforms: it owns the sales infrastructure. According to Inflo Partners' comparison, Close runs from about $99 to $300+ per month. The email builder is basic compared to dedicated email platforms, but Close handles the hand-off from a reactivation campaign to a sales team smoothly. You can track which reactivated leads actually booked calls and closed deals. For a residential brokerage, that tracking is the useful part. If your reactivation campaign is meant to feed agents or an ISA team rather than an automated funnel, Close gives you a place to manage the follow-up and see what came from reactivation versus new leads. It's a CRM first, email second, which means it's a reasonable choice if you're already in the market for a CRM and want reactivation tracking built in. The limitation is that Close isn't a reactivation provider in the execution sense. It won't write your messages, run multi-channel outreach, or make AI calls. You're buying the system of record, not the campaign. If you already have a CRM you're happy with, adding Close creates a second system rather than solving the reactivation problem. It's on this list because the hand-off and tracking matter, and Close does that part well.
Pros
- Strong sales pipeline and deal tracking
- Clear hand-off from campaign to sales team
- Transparent pricing tiers
- Good fit if you're already shopping for a CRM
Cons
- Basic email builder compared to dedicated platforms
- Not a reactivation execution service
- Creates a second system if you already have a CRM
- No AI calling or multi-channel outreach included
Best for: Brokerages that need a CRM to manage reactivated leads through a sales process and want to track which reactivation efforts actually produced booked calls and closings.
Picking a reactivation provider comes down to one question: do you want to run the campaign or have it run for you? If you have an ISA team and a marketing person with bandwidth, a framework like Launch Leads plus an email platform like Klaviyo or a CRM like Close can work. If you want the outreach, qualification, and booking handled end to end, a service like Worqd or Olivia is the better fit. Happy Grasshopper and RealtyLT sit in between, with strong messaging and compliance guidance but less live conversation handling. Whatever you choose, check the consent rules before anyone sends a message with your brokerage's name on it. The federal do-not-call exemption has dates in it, and an automated text or call to a mobile number needs written consent. Ask any vendor how they handle that before you sign. If you want to see what a done-for-you reactivation program looks like for your brokerage, book a free growth call with Worqd. You'll leave with a clear picture of what's sitting in your CRM and what it would take to turn it into booked appointments.
Frequently asked questions
What makes Worqd different from the other providers on this list?
Worqd is a growth agency, not a software platform. It runs reactivation as a retainer service, working with your existing CRM and handling outreach, qualification, and booking end to end. Its AI SDRs and voice agents respond in under 60 seconds, 24/7, and appointments arrive with the lead's reply and context attached. It also pairs reactivation with new lead generation, demand generation, and creative under one partner, so you're not managing separate vendors for ads and follow-up. The trade-off is that you don't control the day-to-day execution the way you would with a self-serve tool.
How much does old lead reactivation cost for a residential brokerage?
It varies widely by model. Email platforms like Klaviyo run from about $20 to $1,200 per month depending on volume, and Close runs from about $99 to $300+ per month, according to Inflo Partners' 2026 comparison. Service providers like Worqd, Happy Grasshopper, and RealtyLT don't publish rates and scope pricing on a call. Worqd prices against recovered conversations rather than hours logged. Budget for both the tool or service and the internal time to manage it, which is often the larger cost.
Is it legal to text or call old real estate leads?
It depends on consent and timing. RealtyLT's public guidance walks through federal do-not-call rules, including the established business relationship exemption under 47 CFR 64.1200(f)(5), which it says runs from a purchase or transaction within the 18 months preceding the call, or on the basis of an inquiry or application. An automated call or text to a mobile number needs written consent. The rules are specific and the dates matter. Check your records and consult counsel before launching any campaign, and ask any vendor how they handle consent before they send a message with your name on it.
How many old leads typically convert in a reactivation campaign?
Expect most of the list to say no. RealtyLT frames that as the expected result rather than a failure, with the value coming from the handful whose circumstances have changed. Inflo Partners reports that structured reactivation campaigns typically recover 5–15% of inactive databases within 60 days, though that figure comes from a general business context rather than real estate specifically. The realistic goal is to find the small number of people whose life has changed and get them onto your calendar with context, not to revive the whole list.
Can I run reactivation through my existing CRM?
Yes, and that's often the better path. Worqd works with your existing CRM with no platform switch. Launch Leads' framework is designed to be run from your current records. Close is a CRM itself, so it's only worth adding if you're already shopping for one. The main thing to check is whether your CRM can export segments and whether it has an API or native integration with whichever outreach tool you choose. If it can't, you'll be copying lists manually, which kills consistency.
Should I use an AI voice agent or a human ISA team for reactivation?
It depends on volume and budget. AI voice agents like Olivia and Worqd's AI SDRs handle high volume around the clock without adding headcount, and they can escalate hot conversations to a human with context. A human ISA team may build better rapport on complex or high-value conversations, but most brokerages can't staff enough hours to work an entire dormant database consistently. A common pattern is AI for first contact and qualification, with humans taking over the conversations that matter. Whichever you choose, make sure the hand-off includes what the lead actually said.
What's the first step before launching a reactivation campaign?
Clean and segment the list. Launch Leads' framework recommends verifying that contacts still work at the same number or email before outreach, and reconstructing the story from CRM notes, email threads, and call records so your first message can reference what the person actually asked about. Then group contacts by original request and time since last contact. A generic 'just checking in' message to a three-year-old lead reads as spam. A specific reference to their original inquiry reads as a follow-up. That difference is most of the campaign.